Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In nominal terms ignoring the ~15% inflation.

PS: Inflation only shows up once as "The household debt figures are not adjusted for inflation" but that still renders the headline meaningless.



Also, "per capita"?


Also no mention of "share of GDP".

Basically, the article is rubbish.


http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/households-deb...

Switch the graph to 10 year. We're significantly lower on the household side, not so on the government side.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/government-deb...


Share of GDP seems important. Why is this rubbish?


Not the OP, but I think the comment meant that without inflation adjustment and proper ratios, you can't draw correct conclusions.

The nominal number is big, but 2008 number is today's dollars would have been $14.17 trillion, or 11.3% higher than the current debt reported.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: