I didn't downvote you, but consider that I answered the GP's question and solved a problem they are having, and you added some snark.
There is plenty of talk in this space about trading off machine resources for programmer effectiveness, so while your gripe is technically accurate that ship has sailed long long ago.
Well, in my experience the double-click-convenience of .bat files (due to their default cmd.exe association) is the reason people do this, not just the execution policy.
To sign a script you run:
Set-AuthenticodeSignature foo.ps1 $someCert
and make sure that $someCert 's pubkey is available on every user's computer.
The alternative is of course to get every user to run `Set-ExecutionPolicy Unrestricted` to solve the "problem" permanently.
But what's the alternative? What's the proper way of signing a script, and how much work is it to do that?