Well, if that's just severance that may be simpler case. But in general clawback clauses may extend years behind. OTOH, Wikipedia says[1]:
The prevalence of clawback provisions among Fortune 100 companies increased from lower than 3% prior to 2005 to 82% in 2010.
If everybody (or nearly everybody) starts doing so, then the competitive disadvantage of having such clauses is reduced, since it may still be better to have risky CEO job in F100 company than not having one.
The prevalence of clawback provisions among Fortune 100 companies increased from lower than 3% prior to 2005 to 82% in 2010.
If everybody (or nearly everybody) starts doing so, then the competitive disadvantage of having such clauses is reduced, since it may still be better to have risky CEO job in F100 company than not having one.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clawback