Some of the article was okay (although you can cherry-pick a lot to achieve a conclusion) but Langer's study in particular seemed very dubious. They "looked younger"? Stop - that's just way too objective for me!
>They "looked younger"? Stop - that's just way too objective for me!
What part of this kind of process:
they showed before and after pictures of them to third parties who didn't know them --nor did they know the order the pictures were taken-- and the majority identified the latter as younger looking
