What is so good about this? It's straight out of the getting hired 101 stuff that most folks heard in college.
What about spending your time becoming someone worth hiring? Then moving to an area where they are hiring folks who do what you do? I could see the advice in the article working for a non-technical person, like a sales guy, but who is that passionate about working? "My dream is to come into your office five days a week and sit at one of your desks and work!"
This is just more propaganda from hiring managers with a financial stake in the hire. How are you going to negotiate salary after begging for a job for three months?
My advice: do what you love doing, whether in your current company, or in your copious unemployed time, then present yourself as someone who is very good at X; don't beg.
"How are you going to negotiate salary after begging for a job for three months?"
That was my problem with the article as well. It puts you in a position of weakness/subservience. Most people will take advantage.
My resume is a PDF document, black background with orange borders and text. The pages advance like PowerPoint slides. The headings are Who I am, What I know, What I've done. The whole thing reads like a story. In the very first section, Who I am, I tell them that I'm evolution's gift to humanity. I carry that same playful, yet knowledgeable attitude into the interview.
I sent it out once last year, and I'm at that job typing this now. My boss is quite a character, so he likes that sort of thing. I'll be sending it out to some companies this week, and see what happens.
If you're going to research companies though, find some that are going to be fair. You don't have to beg to be persistent, and if you have ideas for how to improve processes and understand the business, you will be able to negotiate a decent salary.
> This is just more propaganda from hiring managers with a financial stake in the hire. How are you going to negotiate salary after begging for a job for three months?
Agree. Derek Sivers normally has good advice but this is biased. This benefits the advisor more than the advisee.
It depends on what you want to do. Me, I really like cryptography, for now; I accepted a one-year contract at sub-market rates (i.e. the usual PhD salary) to work in that field.
There are, perhaps, five or six employers in the Netherlands who employ crypto researchers, and these people didn't actually have an opening. I admit that it's not the best job from a business perspective (little job security, highly specialized knowledge, sub-market salary) but I really like it.
(Of course, a "Django guru" or "C++ wizard" has a lot more options and might want to use a different strategy...)
You went to a better college, that's not what they taught me. They herded us to services to improve our resumes, and told us to check their job boards and other such bullshit.
I've done what Derek suggests. It's not begging, it works, and the salary I was offered was more than fair.
I'm currently hiring for my startup. Someone who showed keen interest like this would have a much better chance at getting hired.
Good grief. I guarantee you that if anybody contacted me every week asking if I have an unadvertised job for them, I'd file them in the "stalker" folder.
Reread the paragraph before the one you reference: "Vary your message. Sometimes ask advice. Sometimes give advice. But always make it clear how much you want to work there."
Reread two paragraphs previous to that: "Ideally, you could be more specific, telling them ways you could improve one of their projects, services, or products."
In other words, don't be a stalker, but do be persistent, helpful, and interesting.
Reread the paragraph before the one you reference: "Vary your message"
Don't matter. Still annoying if you are doing it every week.
In other words, don't be a stalker, but do be persistent, helpful, and interesting.
Most people overrate their ability to be interesting or helpful, and "persistent" is just too annoying. And cold-calling multiple times is so beyond rude, I can't even begin to grasp why anyone would advise it.
The idea that I would not have an open job call just because some dude has been pestering us every week for the last year... I find this baffling.
Perhaps things are different in SV.
Edit: I just remembered where I'd found this better phrased:
Quote: "It’s not about being the most attention-seeking candidate. It’s about being the most qualified candidate. If it’s not, you’re applying to the wrong company."
dude, what did you expect? You specifically target companies who respond to the flashy one, not the talented one. If you try to side-step meritocracies, you can’t complain when you end up working someplace with no meritocracy.
My current employer once interviewed someone who brought in public photos of the departmental director and printed out webpages relating to stuff he did at previous jobs, I guess to prove that she was interested in what we do. She also made weird comments about visible personal possessions lying around in cubicles. Super creepy.
This kind of thing makes me crazy: "It doesn't matter if they're not hiring."
If it's a small company... there's a good chance they're really not hiring. My family runs a consulting business, and our website says we're not hiring: http://seliger.com/faq.html#anchor6 . But we get people who send us e-mails (hire me!), to which we reply, "we're not hiring," and then call us and say the same thing, which gets a very fast hang up.
When people do this, they're wasting their time and our time. But they do it anyway. It doesn't matter how smart you are: we're still not hiring, even if you do this: "
Learn all about them. Read every page of their website. Become a customer. Read every article about them. Study and memorize this info."
Derek's a bright guy, and I respect him. He doesn't even know me. To anyone consider trying this: don't let this advice land you a restraining order. I just thought I'd share an anecdote:
I had a applicant do this, including the "in-person" bit. The poor girl in HR thought she had a stalker, and I didn't appreciate the incessant badgering. Don't call from different numbers, use fake names, and state different agendas to talk to people.
To tell you the truth, I'd feel like a nut case saying something like "You are my favorite company. It's my dream to work for you. If you have any aspect that could use a little help, let me do it, and I promise you it'll thrive. I'm that passionate about this."
Perhaps he is just trying to say something else? Albeit in a really bad way. In some ways the post is just too vague, but I see it this way; constantly remind that organization that you are of some value, which isn't such bad advice at the end of the day.
I recently read Dale Carengie's book. Although, I started reading it with a WTF-Is-This? point of view, but I've fallen in love with his idea. I think that he has an important point. People, like everyone else, that make up those companies are only interested in themselves, in order to make them follow your path you have to be interested in the. Instead of just kissing someone's ass this means actually making contribution to that person be it in their work, or personal lives.
Most of us would walk away from that article with an idea of counterfeit charisma, but the real deal is something quite different. Something that all of us sense, but cannot define. Take a look at this article he linked to (http://sivers.org/tom-williams), which simply made my night. That person had the drive and the talent to do something, but he short circuited a process that would take years upon years to achieve, and I think that there is a lesson in there for all of us to learn.
Which Carnegie book? I've read 2 of his; I liked How to Stop Worrying and Start Living better than the more widely known How to Win Friends and Influence People, but they are both somewhat useful.
You will get hired with this approach, yes. But it is the best way to destroy your own value. If someone is constantly asking for a job at this special company, he is also willing to make a lot of compromises for it.
As the author stated, this is an "employer's point of view".
I'm not sure because the picture is a bit blurry, but whoever owns that dog should consider reducing the amount he feeds it. It looks rather over-weight.
Also, it only applies if you really really want to work for someone else. Most people just want to make 60-120k working 40-hour weeks. If you just want to get a job that has a high pay to work ratio, you should beef up your resume/credentials instead. If you really really want to work hard so you can succeed some day in the future, a startup might be your best bet.
Maybe. It seems to be a "how to get hired" article that only takes into account the company's interests though. Specifically, focusing all your effort on one company is ridiculous.
If you're genuinely good at what you do, you should try hard to get at least two offers. Not so that you can ping pong back and forth between companies and try to eek out the most money possible, rather just hinting to companies that other companies are interested in you is usually good enough to get a decent offer without any hassle.
I'd agree. If you've already built up a high reputation in some area and are a well recognised person in that particular field then possibly the pestering strategy might work - especially if you can provide genuinely relevant hints and tips.
However, I think in the large majority of cases the pestering strategy isn't going to work, because cold calling multiple times soon beings to appear rude.
Or you can try another approach: demonstrate value to the company by finding solutions to problems they didn't realize they had in the first place.
If you are a designer - offer a mock up with descriptions of how your design is an improvement.
If you are a programmer - provide bug fixes or build a feature that the company's product lacks.
Provide value and make yourself indispensable so that they will want to hire you before you even ask.
Don't just approach the company asking "what can I do for you?" instead approach them with "I respect your company, here are some solutions that I think will benefit you. Let me know if there are any other ways that I can help."
I'm not so certain that this is really good advice in the modern job market. Pestering people continually may not be a great strategy. If I was the company guy at the end of the phone taking very similar "I want a job" calls from the same person all the time I'd be inclined to dismiss them as a loony, even if their qualifications looked good on paper (or in an email).
In the modern era I'm not sure that it's necessarily a good idea to pin all your hopes and job finding efforts onto a single company. Probably it's wiser to consider a range of companies, and not appear to be suffering from OCD even if you really do love the companies you're dealing with.
Also, from the early part of my own career I know that people who are genuinely eager and somewhat naive can also get horribly exploited, so if pestering succeeds then be careful that you're not just being used like a throwaway consumable.
In my experience, it is actually better to be nonchalant about wanting to work for a particular company. People respond better to you if they know you're interested yet have other options.
I have never read a "how to get hired" book ever; and if those books sound like this, I am so thankful that I did not read it during my college. What is the crux of whole write-up? Is it trying to say that anybody who keeps stalking a company receptionist/HR gets a job!!! This can give a serious misconceptions to people who are looking for a job.
Somewhat Off-topic: Assuming that I disagree with his advice to only go for one company, is it reasonable to politely decline to answer when they ask what other companies I'm applying with? I always feel a little bit uncomfortable answering that question, and I can't necessarily express why.
For some types of jobs this would work, people looking for the all the time motivated and enthusiastic, but it looks more like "how to be annoying" manual.
I know a guy who did this and ended up getting hired at the NHL. After 6 months of pestering, they started him as an intern; he's now an organization man slowly climbing the corporate ladder.
I have won bullfights in San Juan, cliff-diving competitions in Sri Lanka, and I have earned trust in the Kremlin. I have played Hamlet, I have performed open-heart surgery, and I have spoken to the Messiah.
What about spending your time becoming someone worth hiring? Then moving to an area where they are hiring folks who do what you do? I could see the advice in the article working for a non-technical person, like a sales guy, but who is that passionate about working? "My dream is to come into your office five days a week and sit at one of your desks and work!"
This is just more propaganda from hiring managers with a financial stake in the hire. How are you going to negotiate salary after begging for a job for three months?
My advice: do what you love doing, whether in your current company, or in your copious unemployed time, then present yourself as someone who is very good at X; don't beg.