> The problem is not and has never been the syntax
Call me unserious or shallow or whatever, but for me - it was a tiny bit about the syntax. More than a tiny bit, actually. The other things you mention, all valid, were just additional barriers to something already fairly aesthetically unpleasing.
It's improved and improving rapidly, as you say, which is really great to see.
Call me unserious or shallow or whatever, but for me - it was a tiny bit about the syntax. More than a tiny bit, actually. The other things you mention, all valid, were just additional barriers to something already fairly aesthetically unpleasing.
It's improved and improving rapidly, as you say, which is really great to see.