Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

He is correct though. OP used an appeal to nature fallacy. The conclusion is correct, the argument is stupid.


In this case an appeal to nature is not fallacious, although it lacked the appropriate justification.


No, it's still a fallacy.

By providing "appropriate justification," it'd no longer be a fallacy.


Isn't a fallacy a false (baseless) justification? I'm not sure how providing justification changes a fallacy.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: