Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> And so hiring decisions are done by interviewers without knowing the gender or how the candidate looks.

It might make the situation worse: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-30/bilnd-recruitment-tria...




It's very sad that "free from sexist, racist, ageist biases" is considered "worse", surely?

Do you agree?


Yes, I agree (check my comment history over the last few days to see which side I fall on).

I meant worse for the problem the GP was trying to solve.


The method (free from sexist…) is better but the outcome (employee similarity to general population) is worse.


I guess it really comes down to the ethical framework you accept as valid, deontological or utilitarian...




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: