We are getting tripped up on language here. I don't have the right to punch a Nazi, but the law doesn't stop me from doing so. It may be a deterrent and I may get punished, but the law doesn't create a physically insurmountable barrier.
In other words, you have the right to declare yourself a Nazi, but then you may become a target for people who punch Nazis. That's not an opinion or a belief, this actually happens.
We're also getting tripped up on assumptions. I didn't suggest that I support violence or hacking. I didn't suggest that violence or hacking is justified, let alone a legal right.
I was speculating that shows of resistance which escalate into unlawful action may be a result of groups which feel threatened but see no legal option to oppose that threat (actually, I didn't even say that much).
>We are getting tripped up on language here. I don't have the right to punch a Nazi, but the law doesn't stop me from doing so. It may be a deterrent and I may get punished, but the law doesn't create a physically insurmountable barrier.
Then your statement is literally meaningless.
>In other words, you have the right to declare yourself a Nazi, but then you may become a target for people who punch Nazis.
Yes. Those people are fucking stupid, and telling people they have the right to beat the shit out of people they dislike is also fucking stupid. That logic is so fucked up, it would take several paragraphs to thoroughly explain why it's bad logic.
>We're also getting tripped up on assumptions. I didn't suggest that I support violence or hacking. I didn't suggest that violence or hacking is justified, let alone a legal right.
You literally said people have the right to get the shit kicked out of them, with the implication it's deserved. The actual literal statement you made is an argument used by antifa to attack people they dislike. If you're going to use statements made to defend violence, you need to understand people will assume you support the groups espousing said statements, for the same reason people chanting "Blood and soil" are called Nazis.
In other words, you have the right to declare yourself a Nazi, but then you may become a target for people who punch Nazis. That's not an opinion or a belief, this actually happens.
We're also getting tripped up on assumptions. I didn't suggest that I support violence or hacking. I didn't suggest that violence or hacking is justified, let alone a legal right.
I was speculating that shows of resistance which escalate into unlawful action may be a result of groups which feel threatened but see no legal option to oppose that threat (actually, I didn't even say that much).