"Of course cars only lasted 50K miles back then before rusting out or breaking down, so you spent some significant fraction of the life of the car babying it."
Oh wow! Seriously!? This is so crazy to me. People always talk about how things were better made "back in the days" but I was always skeptical of that. I haven't lived long enough to know this first hand but being a technology oriented person, I've always assumed things generally get better engineered over time.
Your experience is genuinely shocking because my 2013 BMW has 55,000 miles now and still runs like it's new. I looked under the hood recently just to check on it and the engine bay is still perfectly clean, no oil leaks, etc.
It was partially by design, and partially limitations of technology. It was not quite as bad as 50k though, the EPA estimated the EOL for a vehicle at 100k miles in the 1960s.
Having (unfortunately) the age to remember how it was (and how it is now) the "shift" is for certain aspects non-existing.
In the sense that why it is entirely true that cars (not only the engines, but also the clutch, and brakes) needed a lot more maintenance and much earlier repairs/replacements, the cost of them was relatively low.
The big advantage is that you can run now a car for thousands of km/miles without doing anything to it and - usually - it never stops/breaks. (but when/if it does, your wallet will notice it)
Besides the "almost continuous" oil changes and filter replacement, once upon a time it was "normal" if you were planning to make a - say - 500 km trip, to go a few days before to the mechanics and having him check the car, and anyway you rarely had a clutch go beyond 60,000 km (40,000 miles) or (drum) brakes go beyond 40,000 km (and registered/checked every 20,000 or so), and the same goes for minor components (that someone that only had "new" cars probably don't know they even exist) such as the steering rack, rod ends, wheel bearings, all of these were routinely replaced or fixed at a relatively low mileage, besides needing to be "constantly" greased manually.
But for example the water pump, that rarely lasted more than 40/50,000 km, was fixed by disassembling it, replacing the bearings and seals, with a cost of a few dollars.
Nowadays you replace it only maybe once in the life of the car, say around 100/120,000 km, and it is easily a 300-500 US$ job.
The only thing that I find has gone "for the worse" (though there are reasons for the change) is the timing belt.
Old engines had a timing chain instead that never broke in 120,000 km or more (in some rare cases it may have "jumped over" a tooth of the sprocket, going slightly out of sync) and even when it broke, the engine was built in such a way that the valves had no interference with the pistons, if the timing assembly broke the engine would simply stop working, and in any case you could "hear" that the timing chain was worn out by the typical "ticking".
New engines timing belts need (in some cases) to be changed much earlier, like 40,000 km or so, and the issue being that they break more easily and when they do they do it "suddenly", and since new engines are more compact and differently designed (for efficiency/low consumption), when a timing belt breaks it will inevitably bend some of the valves (if you are lucky) or break the engine head (if you are unlucky) in both cases you have before you a mechanic's bill of several hundreds or a few thousands dollars.
As well, a modern car very rarely leaves you in the middle of a trip (unlike old cars may have), but the difference is that in the old times in most cases any mechanic/pump station would have repaired it somehow with available pieces, whilst now - in the much more rare case of an issue - you typically need a replacement car because what has broken is a small piece (often electronics, like a sensor) that local spare parts warehouses (where they still exist) do not have in stock, and that needs to be ordered taking two working days to get delivered, and possibly the replacing needs to be carried on by an authorized dealer because a special software is needed to do the pairing with the new sensor.
Oh wow! Seriously!? This is so crazy to me. People always talk about how things were better made "back in the days" but I was always skeptical of that. I haven't lived long enough to know this first hand but being a technology oriented person, I've always assumed things generally get better engineered over time.
Your experience is genuinely shocking because my 2013 BMW has 55,000 miles now and still runs like it's new. I looked under the hood recently just to check on it and the engine bay is still perfectly clean, no oil leaks, etc.