How is it cleaner and simpler? It reads about the same to me. | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		eikenberry on Oct 22, 2017 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Reusable and type-safe options for Go APIs How is it cleaner and simpler? It reads about the same to me.

cormacrelf on Oct 23, 2017 [–]

It's cleaner because you can't pass invalid options, they won't compile.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact