Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What I find more surprising is the length they went through to make git work for them.

It would probably have been better if they had assigned a team of highly skilled engineers to design a distributed source control from scratch specifically to solve the problems faced by the windows team.

After all, `git` itself was developed for Linux because Linus was not satisfied with any of the existing solutions.



Why would that have been better?

(Why in the world would that have been better?)


For the same reason that git turned out better than svn for a lot of use cases.

It seems like Windows is not really one of these use cases.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: