Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The good friday agreement was essentially brokered by ignoring it. That seemed preferable to me to the decades of sustained bombings.

It seems to me that no government can make a fully plausible promise that they won't yield under pressure and, in any case, terrorism is extremely ill defined.




I believe the phrase is rational for and applied to ransom situations - just generally pursuing peace with opposing parties is not encapsulated in that phrase, to my understanding.


What distinguishes an opposing party from a terrorist?

(My answer would be, the success of their terrorism. If you are mostly unsuccessful, nobody needs to negotiate with you.)




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: