I feel that most conflict resolution comes down to finding a compromise - like, you get reimbursed or something. For code and the Linux kernel though, there's little room for compromise - half of a shit patch is still shit. So to speak. It's an effective means of leadership if you're in a position where you don't need to make compromises.
When he's angry about a major issue in the kernel, he uses curse words to bring the spotlight to where he needs it. He's angry because, in his view, top-tier devs are doing sub-par work on an important problem.
He's not blinded by emotion, he's just being forceful.
Isn't it? If you're the unchallenged dictator of a project, it seems to me that saying "I will brook no more of this nonsense" is a better de-escalation strategy than inviting further discussion.
Edit: I hope my downvoter understands the irony in their actions.
I rather believe Linus' goal is to change Intel. Some curse words got it escalated to the Hacker News frontpage and that publicity helps. Why de-escalate?
You're right, but I think he's actually accomplished two things - one is to create useful publicity outside the mailing list, and one is to minimize drama on the mailing list. I guess I assumed the latter of those two meanings.
Also I interpreted it as a more general claim, not specifically about this fairly unusual instance where nerd talk interacts with stuff that's in the public consciousness.
