A company has been interested in acquiring my website and I'm looking for some advice from the HN community.
They turned down my initial offer, but expressed interest in negotiating a deal where they pay less up front and then continue to pay me based on growth. I would continue to work on the website and be paid as a contractor.
My website would become part of their large network of high traffic websites and through cross-promotion they say they could drive a lot of new users to my site, which I don't doubt, as my site fits in very nicely with their network of sites.
I'm looking for any examples of how a deal like this could/should be structured. Obviously I'm not going to be paid based on a percentage of pageviews, indefinitely. Should I propose we set up a number of traffic milestones and be paid when a milestone is hit? I understand it's hard to give advice without details, but some general advice and precautions would be very helpful. Has anyone here done a deal like this before?
What they are essentially doing by tying your pay to the growth of the site is pushing all of the risk onto you, and you're getting NOTHING in return for assuming the liabilities that come with. If they don't have the cash on hand to pay your full asking price upfront and instead want to pay it in installments (with interest, of course) then that's fine: they assume the risk of their purchase and operations, as well they should. But that's NOT what they're asking. They're asking you to do it.
edit: For example, say a month after they acquire your site, the company decides your site and only your site is going to start running huge, 45-second flash video ads for all incoming traffic. Why just you? Because they've invested far less time and money in your brand than their others. You get to be the guinea pig for their stupid business plan ideas because you're the most expendable. Wham. You're fucked, they're not.