"No, they don't have to. But I also don't have to refrain from saying they are lazy jerks that are breaking the Internet.
They are lazy jerks that are breaking the Internet."
Nope, you don't. But don't pass it off as different from vegetarians vocally espousing and touting their vegetarianism. It's the same thing. Which, coincidentally, was the point of my OP.
"Pointing out lack of no-javascript support is tantamount to starting every dinner conversation with 'I'm a vegetarian'."
Most of this conversation was you arguing your points about javascript whereas I was discussing why it's the same as vegetarians. To which you've agreed " in the same manner that vocal vegetarians"
Careful reading shows that vocal vegetarians apparently annoy both of us, whereas the noscript-complainers only annoy you.
Thus, you have not convinced me that they are the same. I have only admitted that you think they are the same. That's an easy admission, since that's what you've been saying all along.
Nope, you don't. But don't pass it off as different from vegetarians vocally espousing and touting their vegetarianism. It's the same thing. Which, coincidentally, was the point of my OP.
"Pointing out lack of no-javascript support is tantamount to starting every dinner conversation with 'I'm a vegetarian'."
Most of this conversation was you arguing your points about javascript whereas I was discussing why it's the same as vegetarians. To which you've agreed " in the same manner that vocal vegetarians"