I 100% agree, however arguing about semantics is not productive.
I deliberately chose the word "obstacle" to hammer home the point that the car did not even need to identify that the object in front of it was a person.
If that obstacle had happened to be a fallen tree, it would be the car's passengers that would be dead instead.
Literally all it needed to do was stop, or at the very least slow down.
In this case, I believe the car performed much worse than an average human driver would have, and this video shows without any doubt that these cars are not safe to be on the road in their current state.
I deliberately chose the word "obstacle" to hammer home the point that the car did not even need to identify that the object in front of it was a person.
If that obstacle had happened to be a fallen tree, it would be the car's passengers that would be dead instead.
Literally all it needed to do was stop, or at the very least slow down.
In this case, I believe the car performed much worse than an average human driver would have, and this video shows without any doubt that these cars are not safe to be on the road in their current state.