You are right, both sides are to blame, but this don’t make any of the them better.
In Brazil we have the same mentality of “sides” and I believe that this is destroying the good sense of some people.
It’s not because everyone does it that it should be the norm, or that is not evil.
Our true challenge is how we can stop this type of propaganda without hurting any freedom?
In Brazil All the big publishers are in someway connected to the people in power, so our non-fake-news were never really impartial or independent. Some even say that the media should be controlled by the government (which is to me a 1984 scenario, but not so much different from what it’s today).
I believe that the only way to end this fake-news madness will be a truly anonymous p2p communication, but this would generate another kind of problem.
(Sorry for my english, I’m still learning how to write properly and an argument is kind hard to do, I may sound like provocative but that is because of my lack of vocabulary not my intentions)
> You are right, both sides are to blame, but this don’t make any of the them better.
(Both sides refer to the broadcast/online media & commercial/political ad campaigns)
Blame can only be placed on either party if there exists the prior assumption that people should believe all things which are presented to them as fact. If this assumption does not exist and without facilities responsible for fact-checking then it's only the individual that is responsible for dividing fact from fiction.
> You are right, both sides are to blame, but this don’t make any of the them better.
He wasn't saying this, he was calling out someone who, in a very dishonest manner, attributed a commonly perceived as bad trait to only one third party of his choosing. This, of course, while ignoring the fact that those he was trying to defend did the same and so rendered his argument useless and turned his deliberately included emotional cues into something short of deception.
In Brazil we have the same mentality of “sides” and I believe that this is destroying the good sense of some people.
It’s not because everyone does it that it should be the norm, or that is not evil.
Our true challenge is how we can stop this type of propaganda without hurting any freedom?
In Brazil All the big publishers are in someway connected to the people in power, so our non-fake-news were never really impartial or independent. Some even say that the media should be controlled by the government (which is to me a 1984 scenario, but not so much different from what it’s today).
I believe that the only way to end this fake-news madness will be a truly anonymous p2p communication, but this would generate another kind of problem.
(Sorry for my english, I’m still learning how to write properly and an argument is kind hard to do, I may sound like provocative but that is because of my lack of vocabulary not my intentions)