> Please re-read my comment above because it refutes your earlier comment, in which you claimed that jobs ads requiring combining inappropriate cross-functional skill groups
Your example was explicitly about 'Machine Learning Engineers' with 'React' skills. For that you have presented zero evidence so far.
> I’m not going to reply again
I think that's fine, since your last posts were not able to back up your claims around Scrum leading to making 'Machine Learning Engineers' to work as 'React' programmers. None of the positions you presented were actually for 'Machine Learning Engineers'. Instead you presented job offers for CTOs and Solution Architects - two very different positions. Since you could not provide evidence for your original claim, you came up with a different selection of positions and skill requirements.
For some reason you project all kinds of project failings from staffing to task selection to the Scrum methodology, instead of looking to yourself, your team and your management.
Your example was explicitly about 'Machine Learning Engineers' with 'React' skills. For that you have presented zero evidence so far.
> I’m not going to reply again
I think that's fine, since your last posts were not able to back up your claims around Scrum leading to making 'Machine Learning Engineers' to work as 'React' programmers. None of the positions you presented were actually for 'Machine Learning Engineers'. Instead you presented job offers for CTOs and Solution Architects - two very different positions. Since you could not provide evidence for your original claim, you came up with a different selection of positions and skill requirements.
For some reason you project all kinds of project failings from staffing to task selection to the Scrum methodology, instead of looking to yourself, your team and your management.