Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The article is predicated on the suitability of the tool to be adopted, in the first paragraph, so he omission seems fine.

Obviously there are cases where the tool being pushed isn’t right, but that’s a completely different albeit important discussion.



The opposition might have good reason to opposing you, despite you being convinced you are right initially. As in, while you are pushing for that thing, be willing to listen to them, especially to those in roles different then your role, in case you are just about to cause them problems. You will just do more damage otherwise.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: