Do I need to repeat why I'm not going to take this argument yet again?
>We don't believe such compulsion would be legal and would fight it in court
Good to hear, but you should still be honest about the limitations in your approach. Secure systems are not built around trust and ones that are should not be advertised as such.
Do I need to repeat why I'm not going to take this argument yet again?
>We don't believe such compulsion would be legal and would fight it in court
Good to hear, but you should still be honest about the limitations in your approach. Secure systems are not built around trust and ones that are should not be advertised as such.