Obviously, we don't want everyone to stay poor. At the same time, we don't want certain people to be so low on the dominance hierarchy, that they think violence is their only alternative.
i don’t believe it has to do with position on a dominance hierarchy.
i think it has more to do with dignity.
Those two are the same thing. Dignity == not being at the absolute bottom end of a dominance hierarchy.
Since human society is very complex, there are many somewhat orthogonal dominance hierarchies. That revered old statesman in your esoteric music fandom might be a school janitor somewhere. Those local-star music scene musicians might get ushered into a billionaire's party through the back door of the kitchen, then be strictly warned not to touch any of the food.
being treated with dignity hasn’t nothing to do with one’s social status.
to be treated with dignity would be for the billionaire’s staff to escort the low status individuals with grace and provide food for them in a way that affords them respect while satisfying whatever other constraint which precludes the billionaire from involving these persons in the main event.
to risk ruining my point by being petty: sounds like a billionaire with no class.
