Well, this is on the front page, the top comment is misinformation, the posters left out details that made them look bad, and they seem to be going on a smear campaign out of spite on every platform they have. at what point is any of this in good faith?
What makes you think it's not in good faith? As far as I can tell, Prashant Deva had a series of bad experiences on Azure, including significant downtime. He's mad, and he's saying so.
From his perspective he was using it right; from Azure's apparently he was using it wrong. A difference in perspective isn't bad faith.
Probably the part where he doesn't actually ever say it's a difference in perspective- that's your take. He says AKS is terrible, etc, etc. You're giving him a benefit of the doubt, which I appreciate, but he's gone too far in his bias. Maybe underlying it is a real issue, that clearly hackernews wants to indulge, but the threshold has been crossed.
He doesn't have to say it's a difference in perspective. He's giving his perspective. That's what blog posts generally are.
I note that you don't say your comments here are just your perspective as you trash-talk him. Does that mean you're pursuing a smear campaign and not acting in good faith? Why should he be held to a standard you yourself aren't willing to follow?
