You may not be familiar but a "factorial on the real numbers" is the gamma function and it has all sorts of useful applications. (it works on real and complex numbers except for non-positive integers)
The concerned reader might wonder how it is possible to assert that there is _one_ correct definition of an extension of the factorial function to the real/complex numbers. Why is the gamma function better than any other extension?
The answer is that the gamma function is the unique logarithmically convex extension of the factorial function.
There ISN'T one correct extension of a factorial function.
The properties of the standard gamma function are great, but some might prefer the properties of Hadamard's or Luschny's alternative gamma function.
Like many arbitrary extensions in mathematics -- be it the factorial function or the division function which deals with 1 / 0 differently -- it's a matter of taste and convenience!
Interestingly the arbitrariness of some mathematical choices seem to unnerve folks on an almost existential level. My guess is that it conflicts with their expectation of capital T truth from mathematics.
