"Keep your team small. Smaller than that. No team at all if you can help it."
I've heard this suggestion from a burn-rate-limiting standpoint, but not from a productivity standpoint. If single-person teams were more effective (which I don't believe they are), why aren't they used by companies like Google that take pride in smaller teams?
I've heard this suggestion from a burn-rate-limiting standpoint, but not from a productivity standpoint. If single-person teams were more effective (which I don't believe they are), why aren't they used by companies like Google that take pride in smaller teams?