Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

They've stopped this practice, in part due to this article (note the date - 2013). I have friends who were journalists there at the time who told me about it.


The Register's article on Super Micro (written a few days ago) mentions this incentive: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/04/supermicro_bloomber...

> Bloomberg reporters receive bonuses based indirectly on how much they shift markets with their reporting. This story undoubtedly did that.


I guess the bonuses are not handed the day after, so there's time for the response and to see if the story was legit. Otherwise there's a incentive to write "XXXX Co to restate earnings since 2007, major fraud suspected" and to get it past editors one way or another.

Linking the story with market moves can be legitimate, they are a business news org and market is moved by major investigative stories.


any independent analysis to see if the incentives just didn't move under the table?

"your article achieved so and so? don't mind that, we gave it a journalistic valid prize, here is your money bonus"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: