>The story Beinhocker tells is simple, and not unlike the story Darwin tells. In an economy, as in any ecosystem, innovation is the result of evolutionary and competitive pressures.
/.../
>And like an untended garden, an economy left entirely to itself tends toward unhealthy imbalances.
That's a pretty bad analogy, isn't it? Humanity is the result of evolution in an untended garden. Once humanity stepped up and started meddling with the environment things have rather rapidly deteriorated. I would argue that the way the author got this analogy wrong is also the way they get markets wrong. Markets are efficient in a long term perspective. A free market won't give you as much efficiency as a managed market would give you at a single point in time, but in the long run a free market is going to be more efficient. The management of a market eventually becomes too cumbersome and innovation takes a backseat to keeping the existing actors happy.
/.../
>And like an untended garden, an economy left entirely to itself tends toward unhealthy imbalances.
That's a pretty bad analogy, isn't it? Humanity is the result of evolution in an untended garden. Once humanity stepped up and started meddling with the environment things have rather rapidly deteriorated. I would argue that the way the author got this analogy wrong is also the way they get markets wrong. Markets are efficient in a long term perspective. A free market won't give you as much efficiency as a managed market would give you at a single point in time, but in the long run a free market is going to be more efficient. The management of a market eventually becomes too cumbersome and innovation takes a backseat to keeping the existing actors happy.