Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
stavros
on Nov 2, 2010
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Naggum Nugget
I know, but it was the most concise way I could express it.
BrandonM
on Nov 2, 2010
|
next
[–]
Is there a problem with just leaving off the O() altogether?
stavros
on Nov 2, 2010
|
parent
|
next
[–]
I was going to say "but then you have to say 'complexity'", but I realised I already did, so I should have done that instead.
jemfinch
on Nov 2, 2010
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
More concise
and
more accurate. You're a genius!
silentbicycle
on Nov 2, 2010
|
prev
[–]
Right. Big O notation usually excludes constant factors, but here, the constant factors
are the point
.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
