Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Apparently, SIPC doesn't provide blanket coverage[1].

So no coverage against, i.e. fire, flood, robbery or embezzlement [2]. The first 3 may not be relevant with digital bank that doesn't handle cash, but the last one might be.

EDIT: I misread the second reference. apparently FDIC does not insure against theft or embezzlement, but according to the first link FDIC does provide blanket coverage unlike SPIC. it's still not clear to me what blanket coverage means in this instance.

[1] https://www.schwabmoneywise.com/public/moneywise/essentials/...

[2] https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/consumer/information/fdiciorn...



My understanding (which is limited, so someone please jump in if I'm wrong) is that SIPC does not protect against a decline in value of your assets.

I'm wondering:

First, whether Robin Hood is lending out deposits to margin traders. If not, what are they doing with the money? I don't think that they are, as the article implies, making > 3% on US treasuries.

Second, if that investment loses money, are those losses passed on to account holders? If not, someone must be insuring that investment. Who?


> SIPC does not protect against a decline in value of your assets.

Neither does FDIC, right? Still doesn't explain what FDIC "blanket" coverage offers that SPIC doesnt


Where did you get the "So no coverage against, i.e. fire, flood, robbery or embezzlement" claim from? It isn't in [1] or [2] and contradicts this:

https://www.fool.com/investing/brokerage/2014/05/11/what-sip...


From your link:

>SIPC does not protect customer funds placed with a broker-dealer just to earn interest.

In this case, doesn't that mean the people who just use Robinhood has a checking / savings account aren't covered?




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: