Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

So which one would you go for if you did it again, battery or iboost?



Battery. Electricity is more useful than steam.


Do the financials agree?



Thanks for the writeup. I couldn't find a breakdown for the iboost but the Maslow was 2kwh for £2000.

Given that a water heater could absorb much more energy for less money, wouldn't that be the way to go, or at least go water heater first until you've achieved some maximum utility, then go for battery?


I think the iboost was under £100.

Sure the water can absorb more energy, but what can I do with it?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: