Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To be fair, if FreeBSD didn't want that to happen, they should have licensed under GPL.


FreeBSD quite famously is not licensed under the GPL but rather under a BSD-style license.


I am aware of this. Hence the reason for mentioning it–Apple clearly chose to use BSD because it's not GPL, but I don't think it's fair to complain that Apple is bound to contribute back. This is the tradeoff the project made when they chose the BSD license.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: