The source article is attracting some heat. But, this aside, does anyone else think the meta-questions about the FAA and their relationship to Boeing, and the 'same type' certification process begs questions?
I "get" that people wanted this. But a regulator has to ask a subtly different question: is this actually in the wider public interest which is not neccessarily what Boeing wants.
I "get" that people wanted this. But a regulator has to ask a subtly different question: is this actually in the wider public interest which is not neccessarily what Boeing wants.