The Vatican also has a low murder rate, and probably no prisons at all. If she can’t prove 3 then she has no argument at all, 3 is where the argument would be.
Of course she needs to provision for violent criminals. They are one of the main reasons we need prisons, so if she wants to get rid of prisons she needs to have an alternative plan. She can’t just wave her hand and say they will magically disappear. Only very gullible people seduced by ideology would fall for that.
If she can’t present an alternative, why would anyone care what she says?
Of course she needs to provision for violent criminals. They are one of the main reasons we need prisons, so if she wants to get rid of prisons she needs to have an alternative plan. She can’t just wave her hand and say they will magically disappear. Only very gullible people seduced by ideology would fall for that.
If she can’t present an alternative, why would anyone care what she says?