Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I could see Twitch's thinking be to only catch a few people to make an example of, but in similar style cases with media companies and pirating the paperwork already has the targets name on it; the use of just placeholders imply to me that the lawyers are going to intentionally drag the case out while telling Twitch they are trying to find the "perfect target" to make an example of.


It may be less of finding an example defendant as just providing an example that they are doing something if they're accused of not doing enough later. I expect the case will quickly settle.


That makes a lot of sense, this is an interesting perspective.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: