""The company said that if it learns the identities of the anonymous streamers who have abused its terms of service -- named in the lawsuit as “John and Jane Does 1-100” -- it will ask the court to prohibit them from using the platform and order them to pay restitution and damages.""
I just figured that that was a pointless argument (people on HN seem to dismiss the concept of brand image and how that might have value), but you are of course correct - legal costs however are very directly enumerable
Restitution and damages for what?