Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"Rabin, the former software engineer, recalled one manager saying at an all-hands meeting that Boeing didn’t need senior engineers because its products were mature."

Boeing is dead to me.




Understand the sentiment, but can anyone be sure that Airbus isn't doing something similar.


Irrelevant. If Airbus is doing the same, then they are also dead to me.


Dead meaning you won't fly any more? (beneficial for the environment)


Dead meaning that, in my opinion, they have sold their soul to Satan. Boeing was previously at the apex of engineering. The 747 was a respectable achievement in 1968. The MAX debacle has exposed a catastrophic fall in engineering standards.


Er, that does not leave too many options if you wish to fly...


Yes it means I would be forced to fly on a shitty plane built by junior engineers. Living life in the danger zone.


Interesting - a completely hypothetical whataboutism


LOL - yeah what about China? If they were making commercial aircraft they might be doing the same thing!


They are, such as the C919 and ARJ21.

With Boeing trashing its reputation and Airbus sitting on an enormous backlog I can envisage Chinese airliners making inroads in Africa and Asia. But to do so they need to make solid, dependable products; they can't scrimp or cut corners in pursuit of short-term profit.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: