>Any time GnuPG has to deal with such a spammed certificate, GnuPG grinds to a halt.
So the SKS software is only a part of the problem. Another part is GnuPG, which is unable to deal with a public key with many signatures attached.
GnuPG is written in C (not OCaml) and seems to be well maintained. Looks like fixing it can be an effective mitigation against this attack. Or do I miss something?
So the SKS software is only a part of the problem. Another part is GnuPG, which is unable to deal with a public key with many signatures attached.
GnuPG is written in C (not OCaml) and seems to be well maintained. Looks like fixing it can be an effective mitigation against this attack. Or do I miss something?