For content, rather than code, I generally prefer to use one of the creative com...

tribby · on July 23, 2019

I agree with the spirit of your comment (CC makes sense for SVGs), but I also don't think it's quite as simple as content vs. code. there are many icon sets that are distributed as font binaries, for example, which are software; in which case the OFL (SIL open font license -- https://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id...) might make more sense.

metaphor · on July 23, 2019

How would you differentiate content from code when the thing in question is as meta as SVG?

tingletech · on July 23, 2019

If the line is really that grey, dual license MIT/CC0?

asicsp · on July 23, 2019

I am following what a few books like 'Think Python' do, content is CC and code is MIT (or GPL, etc).