Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is an ontological problem only. The goal here is to solve the problem of that we can't find a rational basis for knowing. If the physical world has primacy then you have to figure out how to solve the irreconcilable perception problem. It makes the philosophy easier to say conciseness is first. I don't understand why we need to have an absolute basis for knowledge as long as our approximations for knowledge are so astoundingly useful.


But then why is this in a Psychology posting and not a Philosophy one if it's just about ontology?


Its a philosopher writing in a psychological venue.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/experts/sharon-hewitt-raw...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: