On further reading, it's debatable whether the "maliciousness" is not the community attempting to take away a project from its founder. Similar to how that toxic Twisted dev tried to push responsibility for maintaining their broken branch of Python 2 to the Python core lib dev.
You can fork, but then you're responsible for more than the "fun parts". The project founder might introduce measures to prevent fragmentation due to your bad decisions as part of damage control.
You can fork, but then you're responsible for more than the "fun parts". The project founder might introduce measures to prevent fragmentation due to your bad decisions as part of damage control.