Saying the majority as in over 50.01% of the population has insurance is a very low bar. What percentage of the population without healthcare is a sign of a well functioning system to you?
Second, what suggest public funds going to heathcare is a sign of a well functioning private insurance model?
Great punt, but that just means you don’t want to answer the question.
Also, significantly less than 50% of the population has completely non publicly funded heathcare. It’s a really odd system when you start breaking down the numbers. We have surprisingly close to a 50/50 public private system, but people get wildly different amounts of public funding.
Not really, Raynor said: 2/3 of people who don’t have Medicare
So he was excluding some but not all people who received government funded insurance. Which is why I was pointing out that was a very odd way of counting.
