But could public prisons have even better results if there weren't heavy lobbying for various laws and policies? It seems like it's another case ripe for regulatory capture to degrade the public option.
talking points produced by mainstream talking heads.
Dismissing other people's comments as not their own is kinda insulting and derails discussion. Obviously exceptions exist for people who spam the same thing over and over, but it's a negative debate tactic that often veers into fallacy.
I'm sorry does it? that's not what the paper says at all
"Those released from private prisons who reoffended committed less serious subsequent offenses than did their public prison counterparts. The two groups were similar in how long it took for rearrest or for the first recidivism event to occur"
