I had an app "suspended" because I had largely sunset the app almost a year ago and thereby wasn't getting bug reports from users that the app was offline (when it had been initially put by Facebook into a weird quasi-suspended state) and hadn't been (and still haven't been) prioritizing checking or responding to e-mails back and forth from Facebook (which have been draconian: I have an application that literally only uses Facebook for its Login feature (there are no social aspects of the app where data from one user is shown to another user: it shows you your own name and profile picture while you are logged on, and that's it), and yet they sent me a pdf file with multiple pages of questions and a requirement that I not just answer them but somehow provide a signed affidavit--with a real signature on it, not just a digital one--that I answered them correctly). I thereby would guess that the vast majority of those "tens of thousands" of apps were apps that no one was even using anymore and which were suspended not because of misuse of data but because the developer was either no longer reachable or simply no longer cared (at which point this makes them either look like they are doing critical work on something important or that there was a rampant problem they caused that they had to fix, depending on your narrative slant, when I'd imagine "they aren't really doing anything and have just automatically suspended tens of thousands of dead apps" is more likely).