Even if the regulators let them get away with that, nobody in Europe is particularly in need of a cryptocurrency for moving money around Europe, we have near-instant money transfers for free (or close to it) through our banks.
I guess they could go for the remittances market, but that's really not where I see Facebook wanting to go.
Messenger isn't all that popular outside of north america. Doesn't matter how much money transfer options you add to a program if nobody is using it. I do wonder what happens if any non WeChat thing starts going for banking type functionality (legal or not).
Messenger, WhatsApp and Instagram are all owened bu Facebook. Facebook is already working on merging them into a single app, to be rebranded in the near future.
WhatsApp and Instagram have huge popularity outside of North America
They are building a common protocol for messaging to be used interoperably, from what I have read. The apps themselves will likely remain separate from a user perspective, most likely
Ugh stop turning everything into an American lawyer singularity. I said FB Messenger isn't very popular outside of NA and it isn't. What more do you want from me.
There is north america, a few african countries, france and a few eastern European countries and australia. The rest is practically WhatsApp except for china which is WeChat.
This fact is only an effect of the EU, it's a single banking system. That's like saying we don't need a cryptocurrency system in the US because it's easy to move money from California to New York :/
I opened one about 2 years ago and don’t think it took more than a few days (it was annoying though, several visits to bank branches to ink sign documents). Did something change since then?
You don't "just get" an emoney license. When you apply for the license you sign up to a bunch of regulatory scrutiny most of which seems to be antithetical to this kind of project.[1]
The UK financial regulators are not dumb and have thought this through.