He is a wifi / cell phone radiation "truther" who thinks the EMF in everyday devices causes cancer
https://www.acsh.org/news/2007/02/16/cell-phone-dangers-stil...
After reading his ideas, I think we should all feel a little lucky that Trump hasn't made hime the head of the FCC.
edit: posting as primary reply, because the point is important, but was downvoted because of how obliquely it was made.
I hadn't heard of ACSH, so checked their about page:
> a pro-science consumer advocacy organization
A consumer advocacy org. Not a scientific research council, as —I would argue—their name highly implies.
Their about page also says:
> We do not represent any industry. We were created to be the science alternative to “news”
The top-3 links in the references section of their Wikipedia page that seem to contradict this line:
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/0...
- https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/10/american-counci...
- https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/10/09/magazine/obam...
He is a wifi / cell phone radiation "truther" who thinks the EMF in everyday devices causes cancer
https://www.acsh.org/news/2007/02/16/cell-phone-dangers-stil...
After reading his ideas, I think we should all feel a little lucky that Trump hasn't made hime the head of the FCC.
edit: posting as primary reply, because the point is important, but was downvoted because of how obliquely it was made.