Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The headline implies some sort of causation, or at least correlation, but the article admits a few paragraphs in that the 737 MAX was “certified under the old law.”


It's definitely clunky, but I think there are a couple reasonable readings:

1) This points to a larger pattern of disdain for robust safety regulations as opposed to a hiccup with one specific product line.

2) The change only happened because the crashes happened later. Had the crashes happened first, Boeing would have been forced to back off.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: