You're missing the point. Imagine having a really complex password - would you want to just scan a code or copy it character by character?

You don’t give your WiFi password to everyone that visits?

I think the OP is making a joke about the fact that some guests who get the wifi password, may spend all their time looking at their phones instead of socializing. That happens nowadays when one throws a party or movie night.

This should be as socially unacceptable as picking your nose at a party.

I was indeed.

These days everyone have 4G internet, so there's no point to giving your WiFi password to everyone.

I do have 4G, but at $1 per 100MB. I'd rather have the WiFi password when one's available.

Not OP, but I've a guest network.

Before WPA3 a network with no password offers less security than a network for which everybody knows the password.

In WPA3 finally the no password ("guest") case has randomly chosen keys using RFC 8110 instead of being unencrypted, so it's equivalent security to everybody knowing the password.

I agree no password is the best outcome, and WPA3 makes that finally no more dangerous than it needs to be.

I mean turn if off once guests are gone, yes it's not safe as everything on the network can be sniffed by your nosy neighbors, you can quanrentine this guest network from your ethernet to make it less revealing. It's meant to be a one-off thing to avoid hassle. Good to know they have that in WPA3.

In WPA3 the nosy neighbours can't sniff anything. If there is no password or they know it they can do an active MITM to get between users and your Access Point because it now uses a PAKE, but active attacks can be detected and would be a bit more than "nosy neighbours". If you use anything fancier than a password (including technologies like EduRoam or GovRoam, Active Directory login, whatever) any adversary has to attack that instead.

To the replies, it was a joke >_>

I think it'd have worked better if s/people/friends

To be a good host?