> Cloud servic-ization is the virtualization of hardware modification locks.
Hence why the FSF advocates the AGPL for software that's designed to be performed "as a service" over a computer network. But "no tivoization" and AGPL clauses do not deny these uses; they simply enable the end user of the software to exercise her rights with respect to it.
That's... somewhat accurate.
Let's not pretend the GPL team itself didn't have issues with Tivo-ization, that prompted license changes.
Cloud servic-ization is the virtualization of hardware modification locks.
So call it opinions about "commercial" or use another word, but the GPL definitely has them.