Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> or DisplayLink which is to be avoided at all costs

May I ask why, or is it the details you have later in your post?



DisplayLink transports video over the USB bus, rather than using one of the alt modes of USB-C. As you can imagine, this introduces compression artefacts and substantial CPU overhead. It's passable for web browsing. Watching any sort of video is painful and forget about any sort of gaming or latency sensitive application


Ah, this is why the displayport to 1080 screen connection looked so bad. I have a mediagear usb-c hub and also a cable matters thunderbolt to dual displayport adapter. Video is much better over the latter, for sure.


DisplayPort is fine.

DisplayLink is not.

The confusion is deliberate, the company renamed itself to DisplayLink a few months after the standard came out.


Sources: it was USB NIVO before the DisplayPort standard came out https://www.cambridgenetwork.co.uk/news/491654

and then

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20061106005769/en/New...

https://glenwing.github.io/docs/DP-1.0.pdf DisplayPort Standard Version 1 May 1, 2006


Thank you for replying to me multiple times with concise, clear, and informative comments. I really appreciate that.


Ahhh, thank you, that clears it up.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: