Since git is something that I rely on for everyday use, and long-term data stroage, and its development is being threatened by the inclusion of moronic changes I completely disagree with, I'm completely unreceptive to jokes. This is no laughing matter.
> 'For a Git user interface this is relatively straightforward and concise'.
It kinda looks like you missed the joke and are now doubling-down on your disagreement.
The author does not think the proposed example is reasonable. You're in agreement.